Work with thought leaders and academic experts in philosophy
Companies can benefit from working with someone whose expertise is in the field of philosophy in several ways. Philosophy thought leaders can provide unique insights and perspectives that can enhance decision-making, problem-solving, and critical thinking skills within the organization. They can also help improve ethical practices and corporate social responsibility, ensuring that the company operates with integrity and social impact. Additionally, collaborating with philosophy experts can foster innovation and creativity, as they encourage thinking outside the box and challenging conventional wisdom. They can also contribute to developing a strong organizational culture and values, promoting employee engagement and loyalty. Lastly, working with philosophy researchers can drive meaningful conversations and engage stakeholders, leading to a deeper understanding of complex issues and more effective communication strategies.
Researchers on NotedSource with backgrounds in philosophy include Dr. Charles Lassiter, Ph.D., Dr. Pantaleon Fassbender, Ryan Howell, Jim Samuel, Shadi Bartsch-Zimmer, Elizabeth Stewart, Eve Ekman, Lea-Rachel Kosnik, Dr. Jo Huxster, Ph.D, Dr. Erin Westgate, Ph.D., Anna Jobin, Jennifer Aaker, and Dr Troy Smith.
Dr. Charles Lassiter, Ph.D.
Associate professor of philosophy with publications on mind, language, knowledge, and culture
Most Relevant Research Interests
Other Research Interests (13)
About
Most Relevant Publications (13+)
22 total publications
Implicit racial bias and epistemic pessimism
Philosophical Psychology / Jan 12, 2017
Lassiter, C., & Ballantyne, N. (2017). Implicit racial bias and epistemic pessimism. Philosophical Psychology, 30(1–2), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2016.1265103
How to power encultured minds
Synthese / Sep 06, 2018
Vukov, J., & Lassiter, C. (2018). How to power encultured minds. Synthese, 197(8), 3507–3534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01899-8
Implicating without intending on the Gricean account of implicature
Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication / Dec 01, 2012
Lassiter, C. (2012). Implicating without intending on the Gricean account of implicature. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 4(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc.4.2.199_1
In search of an ontology for 4E theories: from new mechanism to causal powers realism
Synthese / Jun 03, 2021
Lassiter, C., & Vukov, J. (2021). In search of an ontology for 4E theories: from new mechanism to causal powers realism. Synthese, 199(3–4), 9785–9808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03225-1
Arational belief convergence
Synthese / Nov 21, 2019
Lassiter, C. (2019). Arational belief convergence. Synthese, 198(7), 6329–6350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02465-6
Could a robot flirt? 4E cognition, reactive attitudes, and robot autonomy
AI & SOCIETY / Jan 02, 2021
Lassiter, C. (2021). Could a robot flirt? 4E cognition, reactive attitudes, and robot autonomy. AI & SOCIETY, 37(2), 675–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01116-6
Sham Epistemic Authority and Implicit Racial Bias
Social Epistemology / Jan 02, 2019
Lassiter, C. (2019). Sham Epistemic Authority and Implicit Racial Bias. Social Epistemology, 33(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2018.1552995
Cognition Beyond the Brain: Computation, Interactivity, and Human Artifice
Philosophical Psychology / Jun 19, 2014
Lassiter, C. (2014). Cognition Beyond the Brain: Computation, Interactivity, and Human Artifice. Philosophical Psychology, 28(8), 1245–1249. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2014.926442
Review of David Chalmers, Reality+: virtual Worlds and the problems of Philosophy, New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2022
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences / Oct 20, 2022
Lassiter, C., & Kagan, A. (2022). Review of David Chalmers, Reality+: virtual Worlds and the problems of Philosophy, New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2022. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-022-09864-0
Watching People Watching People: Culture, Prestige, and Epistemic Authority
Social Epistemology / Sep 03, 2022
Lassiter, C. (2022). Watching People Watching People: Culture, Prestige, and Epistemic Authority. Social Epistemology, 36(5), 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2022.2114113
New Ontological Foundations for Extended Minds: Causal Powers Realism
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences / Jun 10, 2022
Lassiter, C., & Vukov, J. (2022). New Ontological Foundations for Extended Minds: Causal Powers Realism. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-022-09817-7
Externalizing Communicative Intentions
SATS / Jan 01, 2011
Lassiter, C. (2011). Externalizing Communicative Intentions. SATS, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/sats.2011.010
How Not to Deal with the Tragic Dilemma
Social Epistemology / Jan 13, 2020
Mugg, J. (2020). How Not to Deal with the Tragic Dilemma. Social Epistemology, 34(3), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2019.1705935
See Full Profile
Dr. Pantaleon Fassbender
Highly experienced global leadership and corporate health management advisor
Most Relevant Research Interests
Other Research Interests (7)
About
Most Relevant Publications (1+)
6 total publications
Application of artificial intelligence: risk perception and trust in the work context with different impact levels and task types
AI & SOCIETY / Jun 02, 2023
Klein, U., Depping, J., Wohlfahrt, L., & Fassbender, P. (2023). Application of artificial intelligence: risk perception and trust in the work context with different impact levels and task types. AI & SOCIETY. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01699-w
See Full Profile
Elizabeth Stewart
Visiting Professor at Howard University
Most Relevant Research Interests
Other Research Interests (3)
About
Most Relevant Publications (2+)
3 total publications
Detecting Fake News: Two Problems for Content Moderation
Philosophy & Technology / Feb 11, 2021
Stewart, E. (2021). Detecting Fake News: Two Problems for Content Moderation. Philosophy & Technology, 34(4), 923–940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00442-x
Negotiating domains of trust
Philosophical Psychology / Nov 13, 2022
Stewart, E. (2022). Negotiating domains of trust. Philosophical Psychology, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2022.2144190
See Full Profile
Eve Ekman
Senior Fellow Greater Good Science Center University of California Berkeley
Most Relevant Research Interests
Other Research Interests (15)
About
Most Relevant Publications (1+)
21 total publications
Participant Reports of Mindfulness, Posttraumatic Growth, and Social Connectedness in Psilocybin-Assisted Group Therapy: An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis
Journal of Humanistic Psychology / Jun 12, 2021
Agin-Liebes, G., Ekman, E., Anderson, B., Malloy, M., Haas, A., & Woolley, J. (2021). Participant Reports of Mindfulness, Posttraumatic Growth, and Social Connectedness in Psilocybin-Assisted Group Therapy: An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 002216782110229. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678211022949
See Full Profile
Lea-Rachel Kosnik
Professor of Economics, University of Missouri-St. Louis, a leading expert on hydropower regulation in the U.S., and other energy and environmental issues
Most Relevant Research Interests
Other Research Interests (23)
About
Most Relevant Publications (1+)
40 total publications
Refusing to budge: a confirmatory bias in decision making?
Mind & Society / Nov 06, 2007
Kosnik, L.-R. D. (2007). Refusing to budge: a confirmatory bias in decision making? Mind & Society, 7(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-007-0043-5
See Full Profile
Dr. Jo Huxster, Ph.D
Associate Professor of Environmental Studies at Eckerd College with publications in climate change, science, and environmental communication
Most Relevant Research Interests
Other Research Interests (14)
About
Most Relevant Publications (4+)
16 total publications
Understanding and Trusting Science
Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Apr 09, 2019
Slater, M. H., Huxster, J. K., & Bresticker, J. E. (2019). Understanding and Trusting Science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 50(2), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-019-09447-9
Denialism as Applied Skepticism: Philosophical and Empirical Considerations
Erkenntnis / Aug 20, 2018
Slater, M. H., Huxster, J. K., Bresticker, J. E., & LoPiccolo, V. (2018). Denialism as Applied Skepticism: Philosophical and Empirical Considerations. Erkenntnis, 85(4), 871–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-018-0054-0
Attempts to prime intellectual virtues for understanding of science: Failures to inspire intellectual effort
Philosophical Psychology / Sep 04, 2017
Huxster, J., Hopkins, M., Bresticker, J., Leddington, J., & Slater, M. (2017). Attempts to prime intellectual virtues for understanding of science: Failures to inspire intellectual effort. Philosophical Psychology, 30(8), 1141–1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2017.1359245
Public Conceptions of Scientific Consensus
Erkenntnis / Jul 18, 2022
Slater, M. H., Huxster, J. K., & Scholfield, E. R. (2022). Public Conceptions of Scientific Consensus. Erkenntnis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-022-00569-z
See Full Profile
Anna Jobin
Researcher at Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society
Most Relevant Research Interests
Other Research Interests (20)
About
Most Relevant Publications (1+)
31 total publications
Subnational AI policy: shaping AI in a multi-level governance system
AI & SOCIETY / Oct 15, 2022
Liebig, L., Güttel, L., Jobin, A., & Katzenbach, C. (2022). Subnational AI policy: shaping AI in a multi-level governance system. AI & SOCIETY. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01561-5
See Full Profile
Dr Troy Smith
Scholar with publications in problematic social media use, online behaviours and cybercrime with extensive training and experience in intelligence and analysis for national security
Most Relevant Research Interests
Other Research Interests (19)
About
Most Relevant Publications (1+)
34 total publications
Understanding Foreign Policy Decision‐Making – By Alex Mintz and Karl DeRouen; Groupthink Versus High‐Quality Decision Making in International Relations – By Mark Schafer and Scott Crichlow
Political Psychology / Jun 14, 2011
Hook, S. W. (2011). Understanding Foreign Policy Decision‐Making – By Alex Mintz and Karl DeRouen; Groupthink Versus High‐Quality Decision Making in International Relations – By Mark Schafer and Scott Crichlow. Political Psychology, 32(5), 924–929. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00836.x
See Full Profile
Example philosophy projects
How can companies collaborate more effectively with researchers, experts, and thought leaders to make progress on philosophy?
Ethics Training and Compliance
A company can collaborate with a philosophy expert to develop ethics training programs and ensure compliance with ethical standards. This can help create a culture of integrity and trust within the organization.
Decision-Making Frameworks
By working with a philosophy researcher, a company can develop decision-making frameworks that consider ethical implications and long-term consequences. This can lead to more informed and responsible decision-making.
Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy
A philosophy thought leader can assist a company in developing a comprehensive corporate social responsibility strategy that aligns with the organization's values and contributes to positive social impact.
Ethical AI Development
Collaborating with a philosophy expert can help companies navigate the ethical challenges associated with artificial intelligence development. They can provide guidance on fairness, accountability, and transparency in AI systems.
Values-Based Leadership Development
A philosophy researcher can contribute to the development of values-based leadership programs, helping companies cultivate leaders who prioritize ethics, empathy, and social responsibility.